Governance

NobleID stewardship with community input via open RFCs

NobleID Stewardship
Responsible oversight and management

NobleID provides stable, long-term stewardship of NOBLEID infrastructure and policies, ensuring continuity and reliability for the global research community.

Community Input
Open RFC process for major changes

All significant policy and technical changes undergo public consultation through our Request for Comments (RFC) process, ensuring community voices are heard.

Public Roadmap
Transparent development planning

Our development roadmap is publicly available, showing planned features, policy changes, and infrastructure improvements with clear timelines and rationales.

Independent Grants DAO
Optional community funding mechanism

An independent grants DAO provides funding for community projects and improvements. Participation is optional and not required to use NOBLEID services.

Governance Principles

Our governance model balances stability with community input, ensuring NOBLEID remains responsive to user needs while maintaining long-term reliability.

Decision-Making Process

  1. Proposal: Community members or NobleID staff propose changes
  2. RFC Period: 30-day public comment period for significant changes
  3. Review: Technical and policy review by NobleID committees
  4. Decision: NobleID board makes final decision with public rationale
  5. Implementation: Changes implemented with clear timeline and communication

Stakeholder Representation

Our governance structure includes representatives from:

  • Academic libraries and institutional repositories
  • Publishers and scholarly communication platforms
  • Researchers and content creators
  • Technology providers and integrators
  • Funding organizations and policy makers
    ByNobleID