Real-time sonoelastography compared to magnetic resonance imaging using four different modalities at 3.0 T in the detection of prostate cancer: strength and weaknesses.

Alexandre E Pelzer; Julia Heinzelbecker; Christel Weiß; Dominik Frühbauer; Anja M Weidner; Matthias Kirchner; Philipp Stroebel; Stephan O Schoenberg; Dietmar J Dinter

doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.11.035

Real-time sonoelastography compared to magnetic resonance imaging using four different modalities at 3.0 T in the detection of prostate cancer: strength and weaknesses.

Identifier:nobleid.org/w1/20260515/CA916DF4

Type:Journal Article

0 views

Support unavailableClaim Your Authorship

View Original Paper Source

Embeddable Badge

[![NobleID](https://www.nobleid.org/api/badge/CA916DF4.svg?ark=w1%2F20260515%2FCA916DF4)](https://nobleid.org/work/w1/20260515/CA916DF4)

ARK Inflections

Metadata Policy

Metadata Formats

Bibliometric Analysis

Impact metrics, research fronts, co-authorship networks →

Authors & Claims

Paper Authors

Claim authorship of this work

Real-time sonoelastography compared to magnetic resonance imaging using four different modalities at 3.0 T in the detection of prostate cancer: strength and weaknesses.

Identifier:nobleid.org/w1/20260515/CA916DF4

Type:Journal Article

0 views

Support unavailableClaim Your Authorship

View Original Paper Source

Embeddable Badge

[![NobleID](https://www.nobleid.org/api/badge/CA916DF4.svg?ark=w1%2F20260515%2FCA916DF4)](https://nobleid.org/work/w1/20260515/CA916DF4)

ARK Inflections

Metadata Policy

Metadata Formats

Bibliometric Analysis

Impact metrics, research fronts, co-authorship networks →

Authors & Claims

Paper Authors

Claim authorship of this work